Dispatches
Industries · Professional Services & Audit

Run audit, tax, and advisory workflows in your own tenant

The platform under your firm's tooling, with attribution and reversibility built in, deployed air-gapped in your Azure with zero egress.

Thousands of users. Multiple countries. Air-gapped. Over a year in production.

Substantive Test — Revenue RecognitionSample tested: invoice matches shipping document;amount agrees to contract termsTested item cited to client invoice and contract onfile.Conclusion: no exceptions noted for this sample.Procedure completed with citations to clientdocuments for each tested item.Client_Invoice.pdfpage 1, line 8Contract_Terms.pdfpricing schedule100+ sub-agents · air-gapped
Fig. 01Work paper with citation chips into client documents for every tested item
Runs in your tenantAir-gapped optionVersion-controlled methodologyEvery tested item cited
What customers say
“Use the Athena platform probably closer to the concept and how it was designed, like, with the spaces architecture where you've got a set of primitives and capabilities, and you bring together the right set of capabilities to solve a task.”
Audit lead · A global professional services firm
“Digital worker, it gets spun up, it gets given access to the toolkits that it needs. It gets given access to the data that it needs. Just exists for the period it needs to exist to perform the task. And then it gets torn back down again afterwards.”
Audit lead · A global professional services firm
“I like that direction, that concept of the agent is the agent. It becomes an entity in its own right with its own ownership and its own missioning, and you get rid of the gray area and the blurry lines.”
Audit lead · A global professional services firm
“The performance, say, the kind of speed and latency on those APIs for creating assets, was better in [our private cloud] than it was in managed cloud.”
Audit lead · A global professional services firm
“It's good to understand the capability of the platform. That how far, and how quickly you guys can get these things going [...] that has been impressive overall.”
VP-level AI leader · A Fortune 500 retailer
“Lets us get a lot more out of our data than [...] We can sit on top of all of the data in [our data warehouse] as opposed to just, like, our little ingested, you know, three gigabytes semantic models. I think we have a lot of power here.”
Analytics lead · A Fortune 500 retailer
“Gave Athena the spreadsheet, explained which column I was trying to figure out, and then ten secs it told me... exactly how the calculation was based on the other data.”
Analyst · A global manufacturer
“He wrote the entire stuff. By itself. And I was there, and I was thinking, alright. If I had to write all this stuff, I mean, I would've spent days, days, days.”
Manufacturing analyst · A global manufacturer
“I send that to the programmer and he said, alright. I read your file. I copied the section of the code because he has the right interface, and it works. Wow. Just like magic.”
Manufacturing analyst · A global manufacturer
“One workspace. All different, let's say, avatars of their output data. Right? Suddenly, it's dashboard. Excel is here. PowerPoint is when it's all together. It's very impressive.”
Global Sustainability lead · A global manufacturer

Verbatim from customer calls. Customers anonymized.

Challenges

What Professional Services & Audit has to get right

01

Scaled by people, regulated by default.

Every engagement re-teaches the procedure, and practitioners who could build tools have no governed place to build them. One approved platform lets the firm build once and reuse.

02

Methodology stays with the firm.

Standards and procedures belong to the firm. The platform runs them with attribution and reversibility, and procedures live as skills in a version-controlled library.

03

Every document needs a lineage.

Reviewers need the version they saw, risk teams need monitoring, and engagements need deletion when they end. Governance has to be built in.

Use cases by team

What a Global Professional Services Firm Runs on Athena

AssuranceSubstantive testing at scale, with every tested item cited to the client document.

Substantive testing

Client documents ingested, the sample fanned out with one sub-agent per item, results aggregated, and the work paper written with a citation for every tested item.

Client document intake

A client portal with uploads against a checklist, read receipts, and reviewer decisions; an agent flags what is missing and drafts follow-ups.

Client data to answers

Client extracts loaded, a semantic model drafted, and a guided application built so practitioners can explore and drill into the work paper.

Continuous risk monitoring

Risk scans that propose plan changes for approval, with every document kept at the version a reviewer saw.

Substantive test: sampledrawn from the populationSample item 1No exceptions notedSample item 2No exceptions notedSample item 3Variance flaggedSample item 4No exceptions noted×Every tested itemcited to theclient document
Fig. 02One sub-agent per sample item, results aggregated into the work paper.
TaxTax procedures as reusable skills and workflows.

Tax procedures as workflows

Procedures captured as skills in a version-controlled library; the practitioners who build create guided applications for everyone else.

Standard packages across offices

Agents, workflows, and applications packaged once and deployed from Git across workspaces.

01Build a skillPractitioner captures theprocedure02Publish to libraryVersion-controlled, reviewed03DeployFrom Git across workspacesOne procedure, deployed everywhere
Fig. 03Tax procedures published once and deployed across offices.
AdvisoryAdvisory teams build their own AI-enabled services.

Client-facing agent catalog

Agents built for internal work packaged with client-facing descriptions and offered to advisory clients.

Client analytics applications

Workshop-ready applications on client data that can be reused for the next engagement.

Firm operations & riskGovernance, retention, and security controls the firm can evidence.

Engagement retention and deletion

Retention follows engagement policy, including hard delete when an engagement ends.

Usage and trace review

Usage and agent traces summarized for risk and quality teams, instead of manual sampling.

Customer story

From client documents to a completed audit procedure

125samples in the revenue testEach one a document, a match, a conclusionBeforeOpen each invoiceMatch to shipping docCheck contract termsWrite work paperDays of manual testingThe old way: daysSubstantive testprocedureSample 1Testing…Sample 2Testing…SampleTesting…Sample 125Testing…×125100+ sub-agentsrunningAthena fans out 100+ sub-agentsWork paper: Revenue testSample tested: invoice matches shipping document.Amount agrees to contract pricing schedule.Payment received within terms.Conclusion: no exceptions noted.Client_Invoice.pdfpage 1125 items completeCitations on every tested itemAthena completedSubstantive test: 125 samples, 3exceptions flaggedSample 3: date varianceSample: amount mismatchSample: missing documentWAITING FOR A PERSONReview exceptions, sign off on the restGlobal professional services firm · air-gappedA reviewer sees the exceptionsAttribution is the product.athenaintel.com
Fig. 04The story in 21 seconds, from the old way to “Attribution is the product.”
  1. Before

    A substantive test over hundreds of samples. Each one opened, tested, documented by hand. An auditor spends days on procedures that follow the same steps every time: match the invoice to the shipping document, check the amount against the contract, confirm payment terms.

  2. What we did

    Ingest the prepared-by-client (PBC) documents. Fan the sample out: one sub-agent per item, 125 running at once. Aggregate results to a database. Write the work paper with a citation into the client document for every tested item. The procedure runs inside the firm's own cloud with zero egress, air-gapped, with data residency per region.

  3. After

    The procedure completes in a fraction of the time with a full trail. A global professional services firm runs this air-gapped in its own tenant, over a year in production, thousands of users. Every tested item cited. Every step logged. A human reviews exceptions; the rest is confirmed.

What to plan for

Methodology stays with the firm. Athena runs the procedure; it does not write the standard. The first run exposes every ambiguity in the written procedure. That is expected, and it improves the procedure. Air-gapped updates ship on your change window, not the continuous cloud release schedule.

Read the full story →

Example workflow

PBC intake and the client portal

SURFACES INWHAT COMES INTHE PLATFORMWHAT GOES OUTDELIVERED BACKWebMobile · voiceText (SMS)EmailSlack · TeamsChromeOffice add-inMeeting botMeetingsWordPowerPointSheetsFiles · PDFsDataWorkflows (AOPs)LibrarySessionsSpacesStudiosMeetingsLakehouseSemantic modelsDatabaseDashboardsWordPowerPointSheetsDashboardsData · APIsWebMobile · voiceText (SMS)EmailChromeOffice add-inMeeting botApps1Agents2Slack · Teams3Apps · portals41 INClient uploads PBCdocuments against achecklist in the Portalwithout a license2 RUNSlack-native agent handlesclient requests with readreceipts and statustracking3 REVIEWReviewer receivesnotifications and makesaccept or send-backdecisions on each item4 OUTPortal updates with reviewerdecisions, replacing theSharePoint-backed trackerclients called the Ubertracker
Fig. 05The route on the system map: Apps · portals → Agents → Slack · Teams. Connectors: Portal with uploads against a checklist → Slack-native agent for client requests → SharePoint replacement → Reviewer decisions
Integrations

The systems Professional Services & Audit already runs

Athena connects what the engagement team already uses and runs the procedures the firm already owns, in the firm's own tenant.

Client collaboration

PortalTeamsSlackEmailSharePoint

Engagement data

WordExcelPowerPointFiles and PDFsDatabase

Firm infrastructure

Cloud tenantGitIdentity provider

Delivery

Work papersDashboardsApplications
Security and compliance

What your security review will ask

Set the boundaries before the first run. Private cloud in the firm's tenant. Zero-egress observability. Red-team-hardened roles. Restrictive computer mode. Data residency per region.

Air-gapped deployment

Private cloud in the firm's own cloud with zero egress. Feature parity to managed cloud. Updates ship on your change window, not the roughly four-minute staging cadence.

Data residency per region

Data residency per region: a global professional services firm runs users in multiple countries and regions. Each region's data stays in that region. No cross-border egress.

JIT, double-logged vendor access

Just-in-time, time-bounded vendor access requested per incident, approved by the customer, expiring automatically, logged twice: once by the platform, once by the cluster.

Version-controlled methodology

Procedures as Skills in a version-controlled library, synced to Git, pulled by every engagement workspace. Publishing to the shared library can be gated to admins.

Work-product lineage

Time travel to the version a reviewer saw. Every save stamped with the author, human or agent, plus the session and message that caused it. End-of-engagement hard delete twice a year.

SOC 2 Type II · HIPAA · Zero data retention

SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, zero data retention with every model provider. Clients use portals, included in Athena services. Usage and trace intelligence instead of a human trace analyst.

For every stakeholder

Answers for everyone who signs off

Executive sponsor

Can we deploy this in our own tenant so the risk committee will approve it?

Yes. Athena runs in your cloud tenant or fully air-gapped, with the same features as the managed cloud.

IT and security

How is vendor access and telemetry handled?

Telemetry can stay inside your tenant. Vendor access is just-in-time, approved by you, time-bounded, and logged.

Audit technology lead

How do we roll procedures out across offices?

Package skills, workflows, and applications once and deploy them from Git to every engagement workspace.

Finance or procurement

How do clients take part?

Clients use portals with guest access, included in Athena services.

FAQ
What can AI agents do for an audit, tax, or advisory firm?

They run the repeatable parts of engagements: document intake, testing, work paper drafting, tax procedures, and client reporting, with a full trail on every step.

Does our methodology stay ours?

Yes. The firm defines the procedures; agents follow them. Procedures are kept in a version-controlled library the firm owns.

Can this pass our risk and independence reviews?

Athena can run in the firm's own cloud tenant or fully air-gapped, with every action attributed and every document kept at the version a reviewer saw.

How do we roll this out across offices?

Build a procedure once, then deploy it to every office from one library, with no manual setup per office.

Where should we start?

With one procedure on one engagement, run end to end in a sandbox, with every tested item cited to its source.

One platform underneath

AGS · Athena Governance System

Records every change by a person or an agent, rolls back one contributor's edits without losing anyone else's, and keeps the model, instructions, and sources behind each agent action.

Palladium · deployment

How the platform is deployed: Athena's managed cloud, your cloud on AWS, GCP, or Azure, on-prem, air-gapped, or GovCloud. Same platform in every option.

How it fits together

Build, Work, and Data on top; 150+ connectors and every surface in and out; one map of the whole platform.

Related

Bring one engagement's document request list.

We will run one procedure end to end in a sandbox and show every tested item cited to its source.

Runs in your tenantAir-gapped optionVersion-controlled methodologyEvery tested item cited